I do admire Geeks. I have nothing but respect for their work.
Their contribution with open source software to today’s world is unquestionnable. The idea that a bunch of coders came up with such great solutions as Firefox, Linux, Gimp, Eclipse, OpenOffice, JBoss (and all Java Enterprise frameworks) to name a few that I use on an everyday basis, this idea is just amazing.
Back in the day when I was working for In Fusio, a start-up doing video games and services for the mobile phone industry, I had this wonderful opportunity to work with a bunch of the most talented ones. These guys implemented the first over-the-air download system for mobile phones back in the early 2000’s. In 2 and a half years I’ve learnt as much as I would have in ten years in any other company.
What I’ve noticed though, is that geeks are not passionate about products. They are passionate about technology.
Just like old tribes have rites to pass and become a man, one has to harness the technology to get some consideration from a Geek.
00’s : a decade of Geeks splendor
The last 15 years have been the stage of a continued irruption of technologies and disruptive products : mobile phone, internet, broadband, Social Web, iPod, iPhone, Nintendo Wii and the democratization of the computer.
Geeks loved it because this was a world they would fully understand and dominate : innovation was a matter of technology and they were amongst the happy few to fully harness it, i.e able to hack it.
Their general position towards Apple has historically be mainly supportive. To start with, Steve Jobs has been the only one to dare and stand before Bill Gates on the PC market.
Besides, iMac have been a perfect alternative to PC, especially since the turn of the millenium with the advent of MAC OS/X based on BSD Unix. Just like on Linux, they would join the brave David to fight the Microsoft Goliath. They were able to hack the system, but in addition, they would be using a glamorous OS and benefit from the glorious image of the Apple brand.
The divorce between Geeks and Apple started with the iPhone. First you can’t hack it, or rather Apple doesn’t want you to. Then, there was the iPhone App store. This is the time where the real difference of vision between Steve Jobs and Geeks became blatant.
Steve Jobs is interested in a) providing the best and simplest products and applications to the broader range of people b) providing a unified user experience and c) fostering an ecosystem : iPod has iTunes, iPhone has App store.
With the App Store, anyone can develop and distribute a piece of software that anybody will be able to install and run smoothly on a glamorous device. Applications became social objects as opposed to technological trophies.
While making the iPhone SDK public, Jobs offered the possibility to anyone to be really innovative. I.e not only along the technological axis but also on the design, marketing and usability ones.
Here is the problem for Geeks : technology is largely democratized. Technological prowesses are no longer something to be proud of. Lovely apps are. What people want is apps that are useful and usable by anyone, regardless of how complicated they are.
Steve Jobs vision has completely hidden the technology behind the usability in the innovation definition. In Geeks law, this is sacrilege.
iPad = the Wii of the computing world
There comes the iPad. No spectacular new technology : iPad is merely a big iPod from a hacker perspective. No multi-task, not possible to develop applications etc … No chance it can gain any traction in the Geeks community.
This reminds me how hard core gamers laughed about the Wii when it came out. The technical specifications were just ridiculous compared to forthcoming PS-3 or XBox 360. However, in the end who won ? Wii because the strategy was not to bring the best technology to the minority of hard core gamers. It was to bring the best product to the majority of people, with a special target on people that never played video games before.
How ? In bringing a product that is fun and dead easy to use.
(Geeks still managed to do incredibly fun things while hacking the Wii though)
iPad = iPhone for senior people
iPad strategy is identical : to bring a glorious user experience to people that shy away from the technology.
My take : this is a fantastic device that will have tremendous success with senior people. Senior people don’t care about technology. They care about products : ease, usability, design. To read their paper. To browse the internet. To play around on a big enough screen with the pictures of their grand children.
And to read books. And to buy books.
iPhone is the perfect products for teenagers and active people : small, mobile, connected, sexy.
iPad will be the perfect product for senior people : comfortable, large, easy : the best user experience to do few things but to do them with maximal comfort.
Single Task as a feature
iPhone is used on the go in hectic times. iPad will be mainly used for relaxing purposes in a single-task environment. Hence the single tasking aspect being more of a feature then a restriction.
I was quite dubious regarding the positioning : I’m now fully convinced that it fits nicely between the iPhone and the Laptop. Laptop will still be used by coders to develop apps for the App Store, and active people with multi-tasking activities.
I don’t think iPad will take the place of the latter : rather it will be a perfect add-on to complete our lives digitalisation process.
I do share the same vision on the iPad especially regarding senior positionning, ease, simplicity, etc… and I agree multitasking is definitely a feature by itself.
I would be very glad to know how you see the “NO FLASH” policy of Apple on iPop/iPhone and now on iPad.
How can the WEB be confortably browsed without flash ?
Welcome on Heavy Mental mon ami.
I don’t think this is such an issue. Amongst most visited sites, how many uses extensive flash features ?
Besides, I believe this device is not used for flashy funky features.
But for quite reading. iPad will bring a new rythm to our relationship to electronic devices. Slow, relaxing, to make it the perfect tool to read book. So that after wards we buy e-books.
I even suspect Steve Jobs to prepare something to distribute the news as well on that channel.
Great blog posts on the subject : http://ultimibarbarorum.com/2010/01/29/ipad-actually-its-a-chick-magnet/
According to it the target is not old people but chicks.
… while Gizmodo tends to share my vienpoint : http://gizmodo.com/5458855/the-apple-ipad-is-for-old-people
I’ve enjoyed Apple for sometime, they produce technology that is aesthetically beautiful while working like a everytime I use it. Alot of companies aren’t able to say that, it’s typically one or the other. Tech companies don’t usually take aesthetics seriously like Apple. With me stating that I’ve got to say that I’m very excited about the new Tablet. One thing I question though, is it too soon? I’m afraid that this may be ahead of our time. What do you think?
Thanks for your comment. I think you’re right. Apple has made this amazing positionning whereby so far they have pleased both geeks (with machines with great specs and technical abilities) on one hand, and people loving usability, simplicity and aesthetics.
I think with the iPad they are focussing more on ease, simplicity and usability. My 2 cents : it probably would have been too soon if the iPhone wouldn’t have been around for a couple of years. But now the people are ready. Can you belivee that they succeed in making applications developped by anyone become Social Objects ? I can’t : this is a massive social achievement for technologies.
More on the topic :
– 37 Signals : computers shouldn’t make us feel like idiots. Quote : I’m often saddened by the infantilising effect of high technology on adults
– NorthTemple (Rob Foster) : On iPads, Grandmas and game changing. Quote :
My mother-in-law walked in the door the day of the keynote and the first thing out of her mouth was “Did you see that new Apple iPad? That looks like it would work for me. Would that work for me?”
I was utterly flabbergasted. She NEVER talks about computers or technology. She tolerates them at best. Her attitude is typical of most baby boomers I’ve talked to regarding computers. She wants to benefit from them but is frustrated by the wall she must climb in order to do so. She’s learned how to use email and a couple of other things on the Internet and that’s about it.
Her bringing up the iPad was amazing for two reasons. First, someone in her office (she works with other ‘boomers) found out about it within hours of the keynote and shared it with her. That Apple news warranted attention from baby boomers at all is significant. That she then held her interest long enough to tell me at the end of the day is equally significant.
After learning a little more information about it, she has decided that she wants an iPad. It actually borders on technolust.
Love it !
I don’t think the Ipad will be as successfull as the iphone, as it is not as knew and revolutionary.